Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

New York Times article re laid up ships

The New York Times has an article on the number of ships laid up waiting for cargo, especially in Singapore.

So many vessels have flocked to Singapore because it has few storms, excellent ship repair teams, cheap bunker fuel from its own refinery and, most important, proximity to Asian ports that might eventually have cargo to ship.

.......
despite some positive signs, including a Wall Street rally and slower job losses in the United States, many in the shipping business say the current level of trade does not suggest a recovery soon.


click here for complete article

Monday, April 13, 2009

The Anti-Pirate Manual

This was posted by a reader of the New York Times, as a comment to the story "How to Catch A Pirate: Readers' Ideas".

It's the most common sense thing I have read in quite some time.

Maybe ships need to bring back the "crows nest" for look-outs.

The Anti-Pirate Manual

I have organized and conducted anti-piracy operations in the Strait of Molucca, between Malaysia and Indonesia. We found that the best tactic was to let the pirates know you were alert and watching for them. I was working with oil rigs being towed at 5 knots, a much easier target than a tanker or a freighter.

Guns are frankly unnecessary, and add risk of fire, explosion and accidental shooting. It will also make the pirates more likely to use deadly force.

Pirates have difficulty boarding larger vessels under way, so they rely on surprise. Usually, the first that a crew knows that there are pirates on board is when they show up in the bridge. Constant deck watches, bright spotlights, radar surveillance, and fire hoses streaming water over the side are all tools that have proven very effective. Guns are frankly unnecessary, and add risk of fire, explosion and accidental shooting. It will also make the pirates more likely to use deadly force — right now they know that most commercial vessels are unarmed, and to change that presumption will have unintended consequences.

Maritime law requires that ships under way do so under running lights only — they cannot light up the decks unless they are at anchor. This law favors the pirates, as it makes it easier for them to hide. A change or suspension of this law might be something to consider.

There is a vast body of recent experience dealing with pirates. What is happening off of Somalia is not new — the Bay of Bengal, Strait of Molucca, Singapore Strait and South China Sea have been piracy hot spots for many years. The regional governments have had great success against pirates by coordinating military response.

Commercial and private vessels should stick to anti-piracy measures (passive measures designed to deter attack) while leaving the counter-piracy (seek and destroy) operations to the various navies of the world.

— Ross Johnson

Monday, October 27, 2008

Putting things in perspective

The New York Times Saturday Profile highlights a musician from Mozambique. In addition to his career as a musician, he runs an organization which promotes clean water and safe sanitation. Mainly, they install concrete latrines.

When you look at how badly your 401K is doing, consider these statistics for Mozambique: (from the BBC Country Profile)

Between 1977 and 1992 up to a million Mozambicans died from fighting and famine in a war that ruined the economy and much of the countryside. The country has been left with a legacy of landmines and amputees.

Life expectancy: 42 years (men), 42 years (women) (UN)

GNI per capita: US $310 (World Bank, 2006)



The movie, Madagascar:Escape 2 Africa, will be released November 7th.

The premise of the movie is the animals leave Madagascar and end up on the mainland of Africa. If one assumes they land on the spot just west of Madagascar, they will be in Mozambique.

Unfortunately, I don't think the movie will make any mention of the country. That's too bad. Mozambique could use some tourism promotion.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Who is a shipper?

I realize the terminology in the shipping industry can be confusing. We still say "steamship line", although ships no longer run on steam.

A shipper is not the same as a shipping company.

Only those of us in the biz were bothered by the incorrect use of this term in the New York Times two years ago during the Dubai Ports debacle.

"The White House appeared stunned by the uprising, over a transaction that they considered routine — especially since China's biggest state-owned shipper runs major ports in the United States, as do a host of other foreign companies. Mr. Bush's aides defended their decision, saying the company, Dubai Ports World, which is owned by the United Arab Emirates, would have no control over security issues."



This should have said "China's biggest state-owned shipping company", which by the way is COSCO (not to be confused with Costco).

A shipper is whomever is shown on the billing of lading as the shipper. This can be the manufacturer, the exporter (which is not necessarily the same), a freight forwarder, a non-vessel-operating common carrier (yes, that is what NVOCC stands for), or even the brother-in-law of the person buying the goods. Believe me, after 30 years in this industry I have seen it all.

But, a shipper is not those big metal things that float on the water and transport goods across bodies of water.

Those things are called ships.

The companies which operates ships are called shipping companies, or steamship lines, or ocean carriers, or maybe lots of other things. But never, ever a shipper.

Unless of course the shipping company is shipping something that belongs to it, such as spare parts for the ship. Then it would be the shipper.

No wonder people think international shipping is difficult.