Showing posts with label Bloomberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bloomberg. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

More on oversupply of containerships

To continue on the reporting of oversupply of containerships,

Bloomberg published an article regarding same. I am quoting in it's
entirety, as a link might expire.

Maersk Shareholders Suffering With Overwhelming Container Supply: Freight

By Christian Wienberg and Marianne Stigset - Oct 18, 2011 5:00 PM CT


The container operations of Maersk, which carries 15.7 percent of the world’s container capacity, according to Alphaliner, lost $45 million in the second quarter.
The container industry may be facing half a decade of oversupply that will curb freight rates as shipping lines launch vessels into a global trade slowdown.

The rise in container capacity will exceed demand by as much as 10 percentage points over the next three years, according to Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd. That gap won’t substantially improve for five years, Neil Dekker, head of container research at Drewry, said in an Oct. 11 interview. Those estimates assume no slump in world economic output.

Global growth will slow this year as “crisis-hit” advanced economies struggle and Europe’s debt woes prove “tenacious,” the International Monetary Fund said last month. An increase in vessels from shipping lines like Copenhagen-based A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S has helped send freight rates plunging 70 percent since a 2010 peak. On its current course the industry will struggle to turn profitable, said Ross Porter, a Stavanger, Norway-based fund manager at Skagen A/S.

“The market outlook is pretty bleak,” Porter said in an interview. The fund, which has $18 billion under management, owns about 10,000 Maersk shares after cutting its holdings by 20 percent last month. “Given the overcapacity that’s built up in the market, a few years will be required to consolidate the situation.”

Capacity in the container market will rise 29 percent in the three years ending in 2013, according to data from London- based Drewry’s quarterly Container Forecaster report. Demand will grow by as little as 19 percent in the period, it said.
No Layups

There won’t be a “major” improvement in the balance between supply and demand for five years, Dekker said. Ships on the world’s two busiest trade routes, Asia to Northern Europe and Asia to the Americas, are only about 85 percent full at the moment, he said.

“Freight rates are very low,” Dekker said. “It would be logical to lay up vessels, but that’s not really happening.”

The price to transport a full 20-foot container from the biggest Asian ports to European ones fell to $650 in the first week of this month, according to Danske Market’s container index published Oct. 7. That was the lowest spot price in at least two years and compares with a peak of about $2,100 18 months ago.

The fallout from Europe’s deepening debt crisis is showing signs of spreading as far as Asia as policy makers in the euro area fail to persuade investors they can avert a Greek default. Asia faces “severe macroeconomic and financial spillovers” from deteriorating economic outlooks in Europe and the U.S., the IMF said Oct. 13.
Shipping Demand

That means container shipping demand could grow even less than Drewry estimates, Dan Togo Jensen, a transport analyst at Svenska Handelsbanken AB in Copenhagen, said in an Oct. 13 interview. He has a “reduce” recommendation on Maersk shares. Jensen is the top-ranking analyst of the 25 covering the company, according to Bloomberg data.

“Box rates will be under pressure” because the imbalance between supply and demand will persist “for quite some time,” he said.

Container lines have booked orders for new ships for a combined $57 billion, according to an Oct. 11 estimate by Paris- based industry consultant Alphaliner. Over the next four years, new ships will add capacity equivalent to 4.5 million standard 20-foot containers, or TEU, versus today’s 15.2 million TEU, according to Alphaliner.


More Room

Vessels that can haul the equivalent of about 1 million TEU will need to be idled or laid up, the Baltic and International Maritime Council, a Bagsvaerd, Denmark-based shipping trade group, said in an Oct. 13 report.

Ships are being built larger as well. The size of container ships has more than doubled over the past decade. New deliveries this year on average carry 6,100 TEU, compared with 2,900 TEU in the year 2000, Alphaliner said in a Sept. 29 report. The size of the world’s fleet of ships with capacity larger than 8,000 TEU will increase by more than 20 percent annually over the next years, outpacing overall supply growth, Drewry says.

The container operations of Maersk, which carries 15.7 percent of the world’s container capacity according to Alphaliner, more than any other, lost $45 million in the second quarter. It earned $1.1 billion a year earlier, Bloomberg calculations show. The unit may lose money in the rest of the year if freight rates don’t recover, the company said Aug. 17.
Dropping Shares

Maersk shares have lost 31 percent this year. The world’s second and third-largest lines, Geneva-based Mediterranean Shipping Co. and France’s CMA CGM SA, aren’t listed.

CMA CGM has seen the price of its $475 million of 8.5 percent notes due 2017 plunge to 45.567 cents on the dollar since they were sold April 14, according to prices compiled by Bloomberg.

There are some signs shipping lines may reduce capacity by canceling or postponing orders for new vessels, Martin Bo Hansen, a corporate bond analyst at Jyske Bank A/S, said in an Oct. 11 note. Hansen, who’s based in Silkeborg, Denmark, has a “hold” rating on Maersk’s debt.

CMA CGM has no plans to order any new container vessels before next year at the earliest, Chief Executive Officer Rodolphe Saade said Oct. 11. The line was approached by two Chinese shipyards about possible orders for vessels larger than 9,000 containers and declined, Saade said.

Shipping lines are betting demand will catch up with supply sooner than Drewry’s analysis shows. Eivind Kolding, CEO of Maersk Line, said Oct. 5 in an interview broadcast by Danish TV2 News that overcapacity probably will last a year at most. That will still be long enough to put some smaller container lines out of business, he said. Maersk hasn’t announced any plans to cut capacity.

The company declined to comment for this story, in compliance with a self-imposed silent period ahead of third- quarter earnings, due to be published on Nov. 9.

Overcapacity may thin out the industry, with only the biggest companies surviving the pressure on freight rates, Skagen’s Porter said.

“In the long-term I see Maersk coming out as the relative winner,” he said. “They have the financial strength to weather this cycle, which a lot of their competitors don’t.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Christian Wienberg in Copenhagen at cwienberg@bloomberg.net; Marianne Stigset in Oslo at mstigset@bloomberg.net









Monday, August 31, 2009

Bloomberg news - bulk shipping rates to drop 50%

Lengthy article from Bloomberg, basically stating bulk shipping rates will reduce by 50 percent, due to contraction in China.

Aug. 31 (Bloomberg) -- Just as global trade starts to recover, the shipping market is crashing for the second time in a year as China reduces raw-material imports and record numbers of new vessels set sail.

The rate for leasing capesize ships, boats three times the size of the Statue of Liberty, will drop about 50 percent from the current price of $37,865 a day to as low as $18,000 before the end of the year, according to the median in a Bloomberg survey of six analysts and fund managers.

click here for link to complete article

Friday, December 12, 2008

Why are there still bunker surcharges?

I have been meaning to check out the bunker surcharges (B/S), or also called, bunker adjustment factors (BAF), (just so they won't have to admit they are really BS).

I did a post back in September called Illogical Bunker Adjustment Factors (BAF)

Back then crude was still over $100.00 per barrel, although it had come down from it's high of over $140.00.

Today, December 12th, as per Bloomberg News, it is trading around $44.00 per barrel.

So I thought (stupid me) that surely the ocean carriers had withdrawn all their BS by now. Oh, excuse me, BAF. I did a Google search "why are there bunker surcharges". The 3rd one on the list was the site from Tropical Shipping.

It start out really promising:

Bunker Surcharge Calculation Information Announcement - Update

October 3, 2008 -- Over the past few months, the world has seen an unprecedented amount of volatility in the energies market.
However, due to recent market trends that have resulted in lower crude oil prices, Tropical Shipping will now base its bunker surcharge calculation on the eight week running average of the WTI.

The price of crude oil remains highly speculative and our estimated bunker surcharge continues to reflect that volatility. If anything should happen to cause the cost of oil to rise above its current level over a sustained period of time, or conversely, continue to fall over a sustained period of time, Tropical will once again have to assess the current market conditions and sustained market trends to determine if we need to revisit our bunker surcharge calculations at that time.


But - but, but, but

When I do go to their chart, this is what is says:

Effective Nov. 9, 2008, the bunker surcharge is based on the new estimated WTI Cushing Spot* price of $109.00

Effective Dec. 7, 2008, the bunker surcharge is based on the new estimated WTI
Cushing Spot* price of $140.00


*WTI Cushing Spot - this is a settlement point used on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It is based on the price of delivery in Cushing, OK.

So I don't know what's going on. Maybe they laid off the person who was in charge of this project. This is what they said they would do.


The process of implementing a bunker fuel surcharge increase is focused around observing trends in the price per barrel of crude oil. The time periods most often analyzed are: weekly, monthly, eight-week and quarterly averages.
The new bunker surcharge calculation will be based on the eight week running average of the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) Cushing Spot price of crude oil taken every Monday as published on Bloomberg.com (http://www.bloomberg.com/energy). The spot price is put into a chart that we use to track the price per barrel of crude oil to calculate the eight week running average.
The first Tuesday of every month we will review the eight week running average and publish a benchmark WTI Price per barrel that corresponds to a bunker surcharge amount that is presented in a Bunker Surcharge Chart on tropical.com and in our tariff. This chart will show the various bunker surcharges by equipment size based on the (WTI) price per barrel, provide an effective date for the new bunker surcharge (30 day notice) and a new estimated date for the next increase or decrease (60 day notice).



I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt, and say I don't know how to read their chart. I can always hope.

Anyway, maybe I will try to give them a call and find out what's going on.

I hate to start looking at the other carriers. It's all so depressing. They were so anxious to get this additional revenue, but of course no one thought it would go the other way. They should really be giving Bunker Adjustment Factor credits at this point.